Home › Track stats › Best cities
The best cities for track running
Which cities are best if you run on the track? We scored every city with a meaningful number of tracks on a composite of two things: how many running tracks it has per 100,000 residents (availability) and the median runner rating of those tracks (quality). The result is a ranking of the places where you're never far from a good oval. Bloomington, IN tops the list, with 8 tracks and a 10 per-100k rate.
| # | City | Tracks | Per 100k | Median rating | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bloomington, IN | 8 | 10 | 4.5★ | 45 |
| 2 | Marietta, GA | 6 | 9.5 | 4.6★ | 43.7 |
| 3 | Utica, NY | 5 | 7.9 | 4.5★ | 35.3 |
| 4 | Columbia, SC | 10 | 6.9 | 4.8★ | 33.2 |
| 5 | DeSoto, TX | 4 | 7.1 | 4.65★ | 32.8 |
| 6 | Taylor, MI | 4 | 6.5 | 5★ | 32.5 |
| 7 | Bradenton, FL | 4 | 6.9 | 4.7★ | 32.3 |
| 8 | Champaign, IL | 6 | 6.5 | 4.6★ | 30 |
| 9 | Normal, IL | 3 | 5.6 | 5★ | 28.1 |
| 10 | La Crosse, WI | 3 | 5.9 | 4.6★ | 27 |
| 11 | Alexandria, VA | 10 | 6.3 | 4.3★ | 27 |
| 12 | Chico, CA | 6 | 5.8 | 4.45★ | 25.9 |
| 13 | Greenwood, IN | 4 | 5.9 | 4.3★ | 25.2 |
| 14 | Bloomfield, NJ | 3 | 5.4 | 4.6★ | 24.9 |
| 15 | Logan, UT | 3 | 5.3 | 4.7★ | 24.8 |
| 16 | Palatine, IL | 6 | 5.4 | 4.6★ | 24.8 |
| 17 | Santa Rosa, CA | 9 | 5.1 | 4.85★ | 24.6 |
| 18 | East Orange, NJ | 4 | 5.6 | 4.4★ | 24.5 |
| 19 | Plainfield, NJ | 3 | 5.3 | 4.5★ | 23.9 |
| 20 | Lafayette, LA | 6 | 4.9 | 4.8★ | 23.6 |
| 21 | Terre Haute, IN | 3 | 5.1 | 4.6★ | 23.6 |
| 22 | West Hartford, CT | 3 | 4.7 | 5★ | 23.4 |
| 23 | Wilmington, DE | 4 | 5.5 | 4.25★ | 23.2 |
| 24 | Springfield, OH | 3 | 5.2 | 4.5★ | 23.2 |
| 25 | Royal Oak, MI | 3 | 5.2 | 4.5★ | 23.2 |
See the flip side — big cities with too few tracks — or the state-level Public Track Access Index.